GhidraMCP
★ 11.5k
vs
ironcurtain
★ 614
GhidraMCP vs ironcurtain
GhidraMCP: GhidraMCP is a Model Context Protocol (MCP) server that enables Large Language Models (LLMs) to perform autonomous reverse engineering of applications. It exposes Ghidra's core functionalities to various MCP clients, facilitating automated binary analysis and renaming.; ironcurtain: IronCurtain provides a secure runtime for autonomous AI agents, enforcing security policies derived from human-readable constitutions to prevent issues like prompt injection. It ensures agents operate within defined boundaries through mechanisms like V8 isolates and a policy engine that mediates all tool calls.
01
TL;DR
GhidraMCPSecurity & Safety · ★ 11.5k
When to choose:
- You use the free, open-source NSA Ghidra reverse engineering suite and want to give Claude or Cursor direct access to decompilation, functions, and symbols via MCP.
- You need an open-source, non-commercial binary analysis pipeline that works out of the box without proprietary licenses.
When to skip:
- Your workflow standardizes on IDA Pro with Hex-Rays decompilers; ida-pro-mcp is the dedicated bridge for IDA Pro.
- You do not perform binary reverse engineering or disassembly.
ironcurtainSecurity & Safety · ★ 614
Securely Automating Development Tasks: Allowing AI agents to manage files and execute Git operations like cloning and pushing changes within defined security boundaries.
02
Side-by-Side Comparison
Field
GhidraMCPironcurtainCategory
Security & Safety
Security & Safety
Stars
★ 11.5k
★ 614
License
Apache-2.0
Apache-2.0
Install Command
git clone https://github.com/LaurieWired/GhidraMCP.git
npm install -g @provos/ironcurtain
Updated
1w ago
2d ago
Open Source
Yes
Yes
Tags
Ghidra, Reverse Engineering, LLM
AI Agents, Security, Runtime
03
Features
GhidraMCP01Operates as an MCP Server and Ghidra Plugin
02Decompile and analyze binaries within Ghidra
03Automatically rename methods and data
04List methods, classes, imports, and exports
05Integrates with diverse MCP clients
ironcurtain01Constitution-driven Security Policy: Define security intent in plain English, which is then compiled into deterministic and enforceable rules.
02Semantic Interposition & Runtime Enforcement: All agent interactions and tool calls are routed through a policy engine that allows, denies, or escalates based on policy.
03Untrusted Agent Model: Assumes the LLM may be compromised (e.g., by prompt injection or drift), enforcing security at the boundary regardless of the model's behavior.
04Multi-mode Operation: Supports both an internal LLM agent running in a V8 sandbox (Code Mode) and external agents running in Docker containers (Docker Agent Mode).
05Built-in Capabilities: Ships with pre-configured MCP servers for filesystem, Git, web fetching, and GitHub operations, all governed by policy.
04
Use Cases
GhidraMCP↳Empowering LLMs to autonomously reverse engineer applications.
↳Integrating Ghidra's powerful analysis capabilities with AI agents.
↳Automating binary analysis tasks through MCP client interfaces.
ironcurtain↳Securely Automating Development Tasks: Allowing AI agents to manage files and execute Git operations like cloning and pushing changes within defined security boundaries.
↳Autonomous Code Management and Bug Fixing: Utilizing agents to fix failing tests or perform code modifications in a project workspace with robust policy enforcement.
↳Controlled API Interactions: Enabling agents to interact with web services (e.g., web search, GitHub APIs) with granular policy control over each specific API call.
↳Managing AI Agent Security in Complex Environments: Running external AI agents (e.g., Claude Code, Goose) securely within a Docker container, with IronCurtain mediating every tool call through its policy engine.
↳Remote Agent Control and Escalation Handling: Interacting with and approving agent actions via end-to-end encrypted messaging platforms like Signal.
05
Best For
GhidraMCPMost PopularEssentialTrending
ironcurtain—
FAQ
FAQ
What is the difference between GhidraMCP and ironcurtain?
Both GhidraMCP and ironcurtain are in the Security & Safety category. GhidraMCP has 11.5k stars, while ironcurtain has 614 stars.
Which is better, GhidraMCP or ironcurtain?
The best choice depends on your use case. Choose GhidraMCP if Empowering LLMs to autonomously reverse engineer applications., and ironcurtain if Securely Automating Development Tasks: Allowing AI agents to manage files and execute Git operations like cloning and pushing changes within defined security boundaries..
Is GhidraMCP free or open source?
Yes, GhidraMCP is open source on GitHub (Apache-2.0).
Is ironcurtain free or open source?
Yes, ironcurtain is open source on GitHub (Apache-2.0).
Cloud Infrastructure
AdDeploy on DigitalOcean
Host your MCP servers, Docker containers, and AI agents with $200 free credit over 60 days.
→