conductor vs n8n
conductor: Conductor is an open-source, scalable microservices orchestration engine originally built at Netflix. It empowers developers to define and manage resilient, distributed, and asynchronous workflows across various services and systems.; n8n: n8n is a secure workflow automation platform for technical teams, combining the flexibility of code with the speed of no-code. It offers 400+ integrations, native AI capabilities, and allows full control over data and deployments with its fair-code license.
Conductor is an Apache-2.0 distributed microservice and agent orchestration engine; n8n is a fair-code visual automation platform focused on 1,500+ SaaS integrations.
TL;DR
- You want an Apache-2.0 durable workflow engine where workflows are defined as JSON graphs and workers can be written in any language.
- You want built-in LLM task types, MCP tool calling, human approval steps, and vector workflows on top of a microservice orchestrator.
- You prefer writing workflows purely as code rather than JSON graph definitions; Temporal or AutoKitteh fit better.
- You want a lightweight embedded rule engine inside a single Go binary with zero external middleware; RuleGo is designed for that.
- You want a visual workflow builder with 1,500+ integrations, 9,000+ templates, and first-class AI agent, tool-calling, and human-approval nodes.
- You want the ability to drop in custom JavaScript or Python code steps inside visual workflows and self-host via Docker.
- You require an OSI-approved open-source license (such as MIT or Apache-2.0); n8n uses the fair-code Sustainable Use License.
- You want code-first durable execution without a visual canvas; Temporal or AutoKitteh are built for code-first workflows.
Side-by-Side Comparison
Features
Use Cases
Best For
FAQ
Deploy on DigitalOcean
Host your MCP servers, Docker containers, and AI agents with $200 free credit over 60 days.