What is awesome-claude?

HeyClaude is a curated, file-backed, human-reviewed directory for Claude agents, MCP servers, skills, hooks, commands, tools, prompts, rules, guides, templates, and statuslines. It serves as both an awesome-list catalog and a machine-readable registry for builders, with 388+ entries across 10 sections. The registry can be accessed via website, API, MCP server, Raycast extension, RSS feeds, and LLM export.

awesome-claude: HeyClaude is a curated, file-backed, human-reviewed directory for… (★ 280, MIT)

Features

01388+ file-backed entries across 10 categories

02Human-reviewed, issue-first submission process

03Machine-readable registry with API, MCP, and feeds

04Multiple integration options: website, Raycast, LLM export, RSS

05Claim, update, and advertise entries through the website

Why choose it

+388+ file-backed entries across 10 categories

+Discover and integrate Claude agents, MCP servers, and tools for development workflows

+Covers 4 supported environments or platforms, which is helpful for broader deployment needs.

+Ships with a public repository and a MIT license, which makes adoption and review easier.

Trade-offs

!There are at least 8 related tools in the same category, so the best choice is easier to make after side-by-side comparison.

Compatibility

Claude Code

Native

Verified via docs

Claude Desktop

Native

Verified via docs

MCP Protocol

Native

Verified via docs

Raycast

Supported

Verified via docs

Quick start

$ pnpm install

$ pnpm --filter web run prebuild

Use cases

↳Discover and integrate Claude agents, MCP servers, and tools for development workflows

↳Submit and publish source-backed Claude resources for community use

↳Use the registry as a data source for building AI-powered applications

How it compares

≈awesome-claude sits in the MCP Servers category, so it makes more sense to evaluate it alongside tools like plex-mcp-server instead of in isolation.

≈If your main need is closer to "Discover and integrate Claude agents, MCP servers, and tools for development workflows", that use case is a better lens for comparison than broad feature checklists alone.

≈awesome-claude uses a MIT license, and community traction are both easier to judge in category context.